DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Application for Correction of
Coast Guard Record of:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
BCMR Docket
No. 2002-153
FINAL DECISION
This final decision, dated May 22, 2003 is signed by the three duly appointed
ULMER, Chair:
This is a proceeding under the provisions of section 1552 of title 10 and section
425 of title 14 of the United States Code. It was docketed on August 2, 2002, upon the
Board’s receipt of the applicant’s complete application for correction of his military
record.
members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case.
Application for Relief
The applicant asked the Board to adjust his lieutenant commander (LCDR) date
of rank from September 1, 2002 to June 1, 2001 with back pay and allowances.
Subsequently, he amended his application requesting an adjustment to his date of rank
from September 1, 2002, to July 1, 2002, with back pay and allowances.
The applicant alleged that he was not considered for promotion by the calendar
year (CY) 2001 LCDR selection board because the Coast Guard failed to submit his
military record to the selection board.
Two years earlier in 1999, the applicant had been selected for promotion to LCDR
by the 1999 selection board. However, the applicant declined the promotion, when it
was offered to him in June 2001. He stated "I declined promotion . . . as a result of the
uncertainty of the HU-25 Falcon Jet program at Coast Guard Air Station . . . & my
unwillingness to accept additional obligated service due to the promotion." He further
stated as follows:
My scheduled retirement date was 1 Nov 2002, but with terminal leave I was
planning on separating on or about 1 July 2002. I received a call from OPM-1,
the office of officer promotions, in September 2001 to let me know that an error
had occurred. I was not included in the next promotion board for selection
again to LCDR. They advised me that I would be looked at for promotion in
August 2002 & that I should submit the paperwork for a BCMR to get my
original date of rank & back pay as if I would have promoted off of the August
2001 promotion board that I missed.
After filing his application for correction of his record, the applicant notified the
Board that the Coast Guard promoted him to LCDR on September 1, 2002. He was told
to amend his BCMR application to request a date of rank adjustment retroactive to July
1, 2002, which he did.
Views of the Coast Guard
On November 29, 2002, the Board received an advisory opinion from the Chief
Counsel of the Coast Guard. He adopted the comments of the Commander, Coast
Guard Personnel Command (CGPC), which are attached as Enclosure (1) to the
advisory opinion.
CGPC concluded that the applicant "has basis to request that his date of rank be
changed, to receive back pay and allowances from [September 1, 2002 to July 1, 2002]."
He offered the following chronology of events:
Applicant was originally selected for promotion to [LCDR] by the [1999]
board. Accordingly, he was scheduled to promote on June 1, 2001. At
that time he declined promotion.
Applicant's promotion status should have changed from "Selected" to
"non-Selected" once he declined promotion. He was then eligible to be
seen by the next promotion board as an above zone officer.
The [2001 LCDR] selection board convened on August 20, 2001. This
selection board should have considered him. Due to an administrative
error within Coast Guard Personnel Command, Officer Personnel
Management, his new status was not effected until after [the selection
board adjourned]. As a result, the [2001 LCDR selection board] did not
see [the applicant's record].
…. Had the [2001 LCDR selection board] chosen the applicant, he would
have been promoted on July 1, 2002.
Applicant was promoted to [LCDR] on September 1, 2002.1
1 The Chair had several conversations with Coast Guard personnel about the applicant's
promotion to LCDR. The Chair was informed that when the applicant declined his promotion
in June 2001, his name should have been removed from the promotion list and his record
placed before the next LCDR selection board as an above zone officer. However, the Coast
Guard neither removed his name from the promotion list nor placed his record before the 2001
selection board. After discovering that it had committed an administrative error by not placing
the applicant's record before the 2001 LCDR selection board, the Coast Guard determined that
Applicant’s Reply to the Views of the Coast Guard
On December 11, 2002, the Board received the applicant’s response to the views
of the Coast Guard. The applicant agreed with the Chief Counsel’s recommendation for
relief.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The BCMR has jurisdiction of this case pursuant to section 1552 of title 10 and
The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of the
applicant's record and submissions, the Coast Guard's submission, and applicable law:
section 425 of title 14 of the United States Code. The application was timely.
2. The applicant was promoted to LCDR on September 1, 2002. The Board has
some concerns about the manner in which this applicant was promoted, particularly
with promoting him without selection by a subsequent LCDR selection after he
declined an offer of promotion in June 2001. However that issue is not before this Board,
as the applicant has already been promoted, and we do not address it.
3. On the matter of adjusting the applicant's LCDR date of rank, the Board finds
that he is entitled to relief. The Coast Guard concedes it committed an administrative
error by not placing the applicant's military record before the 2001 LCDR selection
board. The Coast Guard stated that if the CY 2001 LCDR selection board had considered
and selected the applicant for promotion to LCDR, he would have been promoted to
that grade on July 1, 2002. The Board has no basis to conclude that the applicant's date
of rank, if considered and selected by the CY 2001, would have been otherwise.
4. Relying on the Coast Guard to have properly promoted this applicant and in
an effort to cure the administrative error suffered by the applicant, the Board will direct
that his LCDR date of rank be adjusted to July 1, 2002, as recommended by the Coast
Guard.
5. Accordingly, the applicant’s request for relief should be granted.
it could correct the administrative error by promoting the applicant without further selection
board consideration because his name had never been removed from the promotion list as a
result of his 1999 selection, even though he declined that promotion. The Coast Guard
promoted the applicant on September 1, 2002. Accordingly, the Coast Guard recommended
that this Board correct the applicant's record to give him a July 1, 2002 date of rank, as if he had
been selected by the 2001 LCDR selection board.
ORDER
The application of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX USCG, for correction of his military
record is granted. His record shall be corrected to show that he was promoted to LCDR
on July 1, 2002 rather than September 1, 2002, with back pay and allowances.
Francis H. Esposito
Julia Andrews
Margot Bester
CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2004-078
This final decision, dated January 27, 2005, is signed by the three duly appointed RELIEF REQUESTED The applicant, a lieutenant commander (LCDR; pay grade O-4) in the Coast Guard Reserve, asked the Board to correct his date of rank (DOR) as a lieutenant (LT; O- 3) from September 30, 1998, to March 27, 1997, which, he alleged, was the date he received his commission as a law specialist with the rank of lieutenant (junior grade) (LTJG; O-2). In 1999, he was selected for promotion, and on...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2005-058
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. However, the Board also found that in light of his niece’s recantation and the withdrawal of the criminal charge against him, he was entitled to substantial relief, including the following: • correction of his discharge form to show that he was released to inactive duty in the Coast Guard Reserve on December 15, 1999, by reason of Secretarial...
CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2006-023
The JAG stated that the applicant only requested to have his date of rank corrected, but the Reserve Policy Manual provides for other relief when an officer is not considered by a selection board due to administrative error. The Coast Guard admitted, and the Board finds, that it committed an error by assigning the applicant a November 22, 2002, LT date of rank in the Coast Guard Reserve. The Coast Guard stated that it could not award back pay and allowances because under Article 7.A.7.b.
CG | BCMR | OER and or Failure of Selection | 2004-179
The applicant alleged that in March 2003, she received an email from the Coast Guard Personnel Command stating that an OER was due for her for the period ending May 31, 2003. Moreover, she alleged, during those four months, LCDR X, who assumed LCDR K’s billet on July 1, 2003, acted as her supervisor on several occasions instead of CDR S. The applicant further argued that if the alteration of her rating chain was legiti- mate due to LCDR K’s alleged unavailability, then the end date of her...
CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2006-001
The JAG stated the following: Applicant's record should have been considered by the [2005] IDPL LCDR Promotion Board. The applicant's request for a special selection board cannot be granted since the Coast Guard does not have the statutory authority to convene such boards.2 However, the applicant is entitled to the relief normally granted in these situations, which is the removal of the 2005 failure of selection for promotion, if any, from her record, and if selected for promotion by the...
CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2007-114
The date of appointment is that date the The JAG stated, however, that although the Coast Guard may not backdate the applicant’s date of rank or award him back pay and allowances because of the administrative error, the Board may do so pursuant to its authority under 10 U.S.C. However, the Secretary may adjust the date of appointment … for any other reason that equity requires.” Therefore, the JAG stated that, if the applicant is selected for promotion by the PY 2008 selection board,1 the...
CG | BCMR | OER and or Failure of Selection | 2002-007
This final decision, dated July 18, 2002, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST FOR RELIEF The applicant asked the Board to replace an officer evaluation report (OER) cov- ering his performance from June 1, 1998, to June 29, 1999, with a draft OER that had previously been prepared for him and that contained five marks that are higher than those in the disputed OER.1 He also asked the Board to remove his failure of selection for promotion. Moreover, according to CGPC, the...
CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2011-083
Therefore, the applicant’s record should be corrected by removing the disputed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, who was selected for promotion to LCDR by the promotion year (PY) 2011 Reserve LCDR selection board, which convened on August 16, 2010, now asks the Board to backdate his date of rank to lieutenant commander (LCDR) by one promotion year (PY 2010) because his record was prejudiced by the erroneous OER when it was reviewed by the PY 2010 selection board. 2009-071,...
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2002-110
Clearly the Coast Guard committed no error in taking the course of action it did at the time it did.” However, the Chief Counsel stated, in light of the xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx recantation and the decision of the State to dismiss the charges, “the Coast Guard agrees that the results of the Boards of Inquiry and Review, as well as the OERs in question and the Applicant’s eligibility to gain a security clearance, should be revisited and the Applicant’s BCMR petition for relief should be favorably...
CG | BCMR | OER and or Failure of Selection | 2001-023
The applicant alleged that the LT failure of selection letter was removed from his record in April 1998, before the CDR selection board met that year. Memorandum of the Coast Guard Personnel Command CGPC pointed out that the applicant was selected for promotion to LT in 1986 and to LCDR in 1991 even though the February 10, 1986, form letter was in his record when it was reviewed by those selection boards. CGPC alleged that, with the comparison mark of 3 and no well developed...